=== on 29 Apr 2015, 08:02:51 Ann Campbell wrote:
See JSC_WRONG_ARGUMENT_COUNT at \https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/error-ref

=== on 29 Apr 2015, 08:54:10 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I would say "[...] doing so *could* lead to unexpected results.", because it could be expected that not all arguments will be given because some are optionals and the body function will check it.


Also what do you think about adding an exception when ``++arguments++`` is used in the body of the function ? 

E.g

----
function f(a, b, c, d) {
 for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
    doSomethingWith(arguments[i]);
  }
}
----


=== on 29 Apr 2015, 12:43:03 Ann Campbell wrote:
I've changed the wording from 'will' to 'could', but I'm against your proposed exception: it requires the author of the call to examine the code of the method being called, which is just not something you should have to do. 

=== on 20 May 2015, 07:09:36 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] not necessarily, documentation exists exactly for this kind of cases.

=== on 20 May 2015, 17:40:29 Ann Campbell wrote:
So can we narrow the exception, [~linda.martin] to: function is documented (there's a comment immediately before it) AND arguments is used in the body?

=== on 2 Jun 2015, 14:29:00 Stas Vilchik wrote:
What to do with optional parameters? Just check the several first functions from http://underscorejs.org/[underscore.js].

=== on 2 Jun 2015, 15:27:09 Ann Campbell wrote:
Per discussion with [~elena.vilchik], the too few args case is ignored by this rule. 

=== on 2 Jun 2015, 15:58:04 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] So no explicit mention of the "exception" in the rule description ?

=== on 2 Jun 2015, 16:32:47 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I've updated description. Assigned to you for validation. CC [~linda.martin]

=== on 3 Jun 2015, 14:39:11 Ann Campbell wrote:
IMO [~linda.martin] no explicit mention needed of ignoring too few args since specialized title narrows the scope.

=== on 4 Jun 2015, 07:47:09 Linda Martin wrote:
OK!

=== on 8 Jun 2015, 11:18:27 Elena Vilchik wrote:
We need to activate this subtask by default (\http://jira.sonarsource.com/browse/RULEAPI-243). Implementation already updated.

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
