=== on 2 May 2014, 15:26:27 Massimo PALADIN wrote:
@ann are you sure about ``++[ \t]++``? I don't really like tab characters on source code. Also, are sure about ``++*++``? Wouldn't it be better ``++?++``.


IMHO the following is not really nice:

----
// TODO                                 (author)   should be done
----

I would propose:

----
[ ]?\([ _a-zA-Z0-9@.]+\)
----

=== on 2 May 2014, 15:33:33 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~massimo.paladin] I buy your argument on the tab char but would like to allow multiple spaces, so let's compromise on 

----
[ ]*\([ _a-zA-Z0-9@.]+\)
----

