== Why is this an issue?

An inheritance list entry is redundant if:

* It is ``++Object++`` - all classes extend ``++Object++`` implicitly.
* It is ``++int++`` for an ``++enum++``
* It is a base class of another listed inheritance.

Such redundant declarations should be removed because they needlessly clutter the code and can be confusing.

=== Noncompliant code example

[source,csharp]
----
public class MyClass : Object  // Noncompliant

enum MyEnum : int  // Noncompliant
----

=== Compliant solution

[source,csharp]
----
public class MyClass

enum MyEnum
----

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

"yyy" implements "xxx" so "xxx" can be removed from the inheritance list. 

"Object" should not be explicitly extended.

"int" should not be explicitly used as the underlying type.


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 16 May 2016, 17:01:45 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] messages should be directive, not statements of fact. 

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]