== Why is this an issue? ``++ID++`` and ``++IDREF++`` are constructs inherited from DTDs, and they suffer from painful drawbacks, mainly: * ``++ID++``s are too widely scoped: an ``++ID++`` must be unique in the XML document. This means that if an XML document contains ``++++`` elements and ``++++`` elements, both with a "name" attribute of ``++type="xs:ID"++``, then two people can't have the same name. Neither can two dogs, or a person and a dog. * IDs must comply with tight naming scheme. For example, "123" is not a valid value for an ID. Instead, ``++KEY++`` and ``++KEYREF++`` should be used. And if you really need to insure uniqueness, use ``++xs:unique++`` to add a uniqueness constraint. === Noncompliant code example [source,xml] ---- ToDo ---- === Compliant solution [source,xml] ---- ToDo ---- ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[] ''' == Implementation Specification (visible only on this page) === Message Use "(KEY|KEYREF)" instead. === Highlighting ``++ID=++``|``++IDREF=++`` endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]