== Why is this an issue?

Having two paragraphs with the same name in the same section or in no section at all is bad practice. At best, each copy contains the same code, and the redefinition is simply useless, duplicated code. At worst, the paragraphs contain different logic, potentially leading to confusion and unexpected results as a programmer who was aware of the first paragraph definition inadvertently invokes the second. For these reasons, paragraphs with duplicated names should be either removed or renamed.


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,cobol]
----
 LOAD-DATA. 
     EXEC SQL 
         INSERT INTO EMP (EMPNO, ENAME, DEPTNO) 
             VALUES (:EMP-NUMBER, :EMP-NAME, :DEPT-NUMBER) 
     END-EXEC. 

 LOAD-DATA. 
     IF EMP-NUMBER = ZERO 
         MOVE FALSE TO VALID-DATA 
         PERFORM GET-EMP-NUM UNTIL VALID-DATA = TRUE 
     ELSE 
         EXEC SQL DELETE FROM EMP 
             WHERE EMPNO = :EMP-NUMBER 
         END-EXEC
         ADD 1 TO DELETE-TOTAL.
     END-IF.

 LOAD-DATA. 
     EXEC SQL 
         INSERT INTO EMP (EMPNO, ENAME, DEPTNO) 
             VALUES (:EMP-NUMBER, :EMP-NAME, :DEPT-NUMBER) 
     END-EXEC. 
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,cobol]
----
 LOAD-DATA. 
     EXEC SQL 
         INSERT INTO EMP (EMPNO, ENAME, DEPTNO) 
             VALUES (:EMP-NUMBER, :EMP-NAME, :DEPT-NUMBER) 
     END-EXEC. 

 CLEAR-EMP. 
     IF EMP-NUMBER = ZERO 
         MOVE FALSE TO VALID-DATA 
         PERFORM GET-EMP-NUM UNTIL VALID-DATA = TRUE 
     ELSE 
         EXEC SQL DELETE FROM EMP 
             WHERE EMPNO = :EMP-NUMBER 
         END-EXEC
         ADD 1 TO DELETE-TOTAL.
     END-IF.
----

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

Rename or remove this copy of XXX


endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
