== Why is this an issue?

:operationName: method
:emptyCode: csharp/empty-code.adoc
:notsupportedCode: csharp/notsupported-code.adoc
:notimplementedCode: csharp/notimplemented-code.adoc
:commentCode: csharp/comment-code.adoc

include::../why-dotnet.adoc[]

=== Exceptions

The following empty methods are considered compliant:

* empty `virtual` methods as the implementation might not be required in the base class
* empty methods that override an `abstract` method as the implementation is mandatory for child class
* empty overrides in test assemblies for mocking purposes

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 11 Nov 2020, 19:45:36 Andrei Epure wrote:
\[~nicolas.harraudeau] I believe this rule could also apply to local functions and to property setters, right?

----
public void Method()
{
  void EmptyLocalFunction {} // Noncompliant
}

public int Property
{
  set {} // Noncompliant
}
 {code}
----

=== on 16 Nov 2020, 14:19:07 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
\[~andrei.epure] Yes. We already do it for nested functions in python. I don't see any reason to not do the same for C#.

=== on 16 Nov 2020, 17:39:11 Andrei Epure wrote:
thanks. I opened \https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-dotnet/issues/3753 for this.

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]