=== on 21 Nov 2014, 14:41:20 Freddy Mallet wrote:
My 2 cents [~ann.campbell.2]:

* I would also tag this rule with label "bug"
* I would associate this rule to category "Reliability - Instruction related Reliability"

=== on 25 Nov 2014, 10:09:37 Freddy Mallet wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] and [~pierre-yves.nicolas], for me here there is no need (at least for a first valuable implementation) to have the CFG. Indeed, as soon as there is a statement "return null;" in the body of a toString() method, this is enough to raise an issue without generating any false-positives.

=== on 5 Dec 2016, 14:20:47 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] The code sample here doesn't look like Java code.

