== Why is this an issue? include::../description.adoc[] [source,dart] ---- @Deprecated("This function is deprecated, use newFunction instead", ReplaceWith("newFunction()")) void oldFunction() { println("This is the old function."); } void newFunction() { println("This is the new function."); } oldFunction() // Noncompliant: "oldFunction is deprecated" ---- === Exceptions The rule does not raise an issue when the deprecated members are used in a deprecated type. include::../see.adoc[] * Dart Docs - https://dart.dev/tools/diagnostic-messages#deprecated_member_use[Dart Compiler diagnostic - deprecated_member_use] * Dart Docs - https://dart.dev/tools/diagnostic-messages#deprecated_member_use_from_same_package[Dart Compiler diagnostic - deprecated_member_use_from_same_package] ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[] ''' == Implementation Specification (visible only on this page) === Message * '' is deprecated and shouldn't be used. * '' is deprecated and shouldn't be used. . Unlike in other scenarios, if the member is a setter, the method name will NOT end with a `=` sign (generally used to distinguish it from the corresponding getter). `` is appended only if the deprecated member has a deprecation message (e.g. `@Deprecated("Use X instead")`). === Highlighting The identifier of the deprecated member. ''' == Comments And Links (visible only on this page) endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]