=== on 16 Jun 2015, 13:34:20 Ann Campbell wrote:
FYI [~tamas.vajk]

=== on 16 Jun 2015, 13:36:03 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] & [~tamas.vajk] should this "potential deadlock" rule be combined with RSPEC-3046: '"notify" should not be called when multiple locks are held'?

=== on 7 Nov 2016, 17:09:31 Tibor Blenessy wrote:
I will start to work on this in my current sprint. Is there any feedback from [~nicolas.peru] or [~tamas.vajk] regarding [~ann.campbell.2] question? 

=== on 14 Nov 2016, 17:31:52 Tibor Blenessy wrote:
Looking little bit more into this, I would say that it would be indeed better to merge this rule with RSPEC-3046 , since wait/notify are closely cooperating and description could benefit from having both concepts described together.

=== on 14 Nov 2016, 17:59:42 Ann Campbell wrote:
rolled into RSPEC-3046

