=== on 31 Oct 2018, 12:43:15 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~alexandre.gigleux] the title doesn't match what the code blocks tell me to do. This _seems_\(?) to be about removing the dead ``++catch++`` block for the parent exception type, but the title indicates the problem is with the child ``++catch++`` instead.

=== on 13 Nov 2018, 12:36:58 Alexandre Gigleux wrote:
Confirmed by [~valeri.hristov] that this one doesn't make sense for C# nor VB.NET as the compiler is handling it and raised error to prevent such case.

=== on 19 May 2021, 15:38:44 Michael Gumowski wrote:
Simplifying the reporting as we now rely on ECJ. The logic was anyway extremely hard to follow (both in terms of logic and issue messaging).

