== Why is this an issue?

An https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/keywords/async[`async`] method with a `void` return type does not follow the https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/asynchronous-programming/task-asynchronous-programming-model[task asynchronous programming (TAP)] model since the return type should be https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task[`Task`] or https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task-1[`Task<TResult>`]

Doing so prevents control over the https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/asynchronous-programming/async-scenarios[asynchronous execution], such as:

* waiting for the execution to complete
* catching any exception that might occur during execution
* testing execution behavior

=== Exceptions

* Methods with the https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.eventhandler[`EventHandler`] delegate signature.
+
Using `void` for `EventHandler` is compliant with the TAP model.
+
[source,csharp]
----
public async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
  await DoSomethingAsync();
}
----
* Methods name matching ``++On[A-Z]\w*++`` pattern.
+
Some frameworks may not use the same `EventHandler` method signature
+
[source,csharp]
----
public async void OnClick(EventContext data)
{
  await DoSomethingAsync();
}
----

== How to fix it

Update the return type of the method from `void` to `Task`.

=== Code examples

==== Noncompliant code example

[source,csharp,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
----
private async void ThrowExceptionAsync() // Noncompliant: async method return type is 'void'
{
  throw new InvalidOperationException();
}

public void Method()
{
  try
  {
    ThrowExceptionAsync();
  }
  catch (Exception)
  {
    // The exception is never caught here
    throw;
  }
}
----


==== Compliant solution

[source,csharp,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
----
private async Task ThrowExceptionAsync() // Compliant: async method return type is 'Task'
{
  throw new InvalidOperationException();
}

public void Method()
{
  try
  {
    await ThrowExceptionAsync();
  }
  catch (Exception)
  {
    // The exception is caught here
    throw;
  }
}
----

== Resources

=== Documentation

* Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/keywords/async[`async` (C# Reference)]
* Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/asynchronous-programming/async-scenarios[Asynchronous programming]
* Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/asynchronous-programming/task-asynchronous-programming-model[Task asynchronous programming model]
* Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task[`Task` Class]
* Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.task-1[`Task<TResult>` Class]
* Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.eventhandler[`EventHandler` Delegate]


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

Return "Task" instead.


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 30 Jun 2015, 13:36:13 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] I don't understand the code snippets. The `async Task` method doesn't return anything.


Also, could you morph the Noncompliant Example into a Compliant Solution, please?

=== on 1 Jul 2015, 07:10:48 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I added the compliant solution.


A method with `async` keyword returning a `Task` is like a non `async` method with `void` return type. Similarly in an `async Task<int>` method we can return a simple `int`. (\https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh524395.aspx)

=== on 1 Jul 2015, 11:31:53 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] that makes me wonder if we should generalize this rule to catch _any_ `async` method that does not return a `Task`...?

=== on 1 Jul 2015, 11:49:54 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] That's a compiler error (CS1983, _The return type of async must be void, Task or Task<T>_).

=== on 1 Jul 2015, 11:59:39 Ann Campbell wrote:
Okay, thanks [~tamas.vajk]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]