=== on 13 Apr 2015, 10:44:27 Freddy Mallet wrote:
@Tamas, according to you, does this rule makes sense ? Thanks

=== on 29 Jun 2015, 14:58:19 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I've modified the description to be more specific. Also, I've changed the examples to use ``++List<int>++`` because for ``++double++``s it won't throw the ``++OverflowException++``.


\[~freddy.mallet] Yes, the rule makes sense.

=== on 30 Jun 2015, 14:45:28 Ann Campbell wrote:
Double-check my edits please [~tamas.vajk]

=== on 6 Jul 2015, 09:33:41 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Looks good.