The Spring Framework provides several specializations of the generic ``++@Component++`` stereotype annotation which better express the programmer’s intent. Using them should be preferred.


== Noncompliant Code Example

----
@Component // Noncompliant; class name suggests it's a @Service
public class CustomerServiceImpl { 
  // ...
}

@Component // Noncompliant; class name suggests it's a @Repository
public class ProductRepository { 
    // ...
}

@Component // Noncompliant; class name suggests it's a @Controller or @RestController
public class FooBarRestController { 
    // ...
}
----


== Compliant Solution

----
@Service // Compliant
public class CustomerServiceImpl { 
  // ...
}

@Repository // Compliant
public class ProductRepository { 
    // ...
}

@RestController // Compliant
public class FooBarRestController { 
    // ...
}

@Component // Compliant
public class SomeOtherComponent {
   // ...
}
----


== See

* https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/core.html#beans-stereotype-annotations[Spring documentation - @Component and Further Stereotype Annotations]


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]