== Why is this an issue?

While it's perfectly legal to give a class the same simple name as a class in another package that it extends or interface it implements, it's confusing and could cause problems in the future. 


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,java]
----
package my.mypackage;

public class Foo implements a.b.Foo { // Noncompliant
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,java]
----
package my.mypackage;

public class FooJr implements a.b.Foo {
----



ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]