=== on 16 Oct 2014, 09:48:44 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I think the array ``++arguments[i]++`` is specific to JavaScript. I guess the spec should be updated accordingly.

=== on 16 Oct 2014, 11:34:52 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~linda.martin] I'm confused because the JavaScript subtask has this addendum to the description:


____
Furthermore, in JavaScript strict mode, declaring arguments with the same name produces an error.
____

=== on 12 Nov 2019, 11:35:52 Elena Vilchik wrote:
Looks like rule was deprecated by mistake, bringing it back to ready

