rspec/rules/S6103/java/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

51 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

== Why is this an issue?
AssertJ assertions taking ``++Consumer++`` objects as arguments are expected to contain "requirements", which should themselves be expressed as assertions. This concerns the following methods: http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractIterableAssert.html#allSatisfy-java.util.function.Consumer-[allSatisfy], http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractIterableAssert.html#anySatisfy-java.util.function.Consumer-[anySatisfy], http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractIterableAssert.html#hasOnlyOneElementSatisfying-java.util.function.Consumer-[hasOnlyOneElementSatisfying], https://tinyurl.com/yxnzt6pj[isInstanceOfSatisfying], http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractIterableAssert.html#noneSatisfy-java.util.function.Consumer-[noneSatisfy], http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractAssert.html#satisfies-java.util.function.Consumer-[satisfies], http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractAssert.html#satisfiesAnyOf-java.util.function.Consumer-java.util.function.Consumer-[satisfiesAnyOf], http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/core-8/api/org/assertj/core/api/AbstractIterableAssert.html#zipSatisfy-java.lang.Iterable-java.util.function.BiConsumer-[zipSatisfy].
These methods are assuming the ``++Consumer++`` will do the assertions itself. If you do not do any assertion in the ``++Consumer++``, it probably means that you are inadvertently only partially testing your object.
This rule raises an issue when a ``++Consumer++`` argument of any of the above methods does not contain any assertion.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
assertThat(myObject).isInstanceOfSatisfying(String.class, s -> "Hello".equals(s)); // Noncompliant - not testing the string value
assertThat(myObject).satisfies("Hello"::equals); // Noncompliant - not testing the string value
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
assertThat(myObject).isInstanceOfSatisfying(String.class, s -> assertThat(s).isEqualTo("Hello"));
assertThat(myObject).satisfies(obj -> assertThat(obj).isEqualTo("Hello"));
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Primary: Rework this assertion to assert something inside the Consumer argument.
Secondary: Argument missing assertion
=== Highlighting
Primary: "isInstanceOfSatisfying"/"satisfies"/"allSatisfy"/... method name.
Secondary: The Consumer argument missing assertion
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]