rspec/rules/S2486/comments-and-links.adoc

23 lines
843 B
Plaintext

=== deprecates: S1674
=== is duplicated by: S1169
=== relates to: S1166
=== is related to: S2002
=== on 19 Jul 2016, 12:19:12 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] there is sub-task for "Java", but it is not in "Targeted" or "Covered" languages - probably because of comment \https://jira.sonarsource.com/browse/RSPEC-1674?focusedCommentId=20875#comment-20875
And thus I'm wondering - if {cpp} should be targeted here or not, in preference to RSPEC-108 ?
=== on 19 Jul 2016, 19:28:16 Ann Campbell wrote:
My preference would be to handle empty catch blocks here [~evgeny.mandrikov]. Other than a gut feeling, my main justification is that mangled error handling has security implications.
(cc [~nicolas.peru])
=== on 21 Jul 2016, 22:49:09 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] okay, scheduled for implementation - CPP-1444