rspec/rules/S3427/comments-and-links.adoc

8 lines
604 B
Plaintext

=== on 30 Nov 2015, 10:54:12 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Could you check this RSPEC? I splitted RSPEC-3220 as it covered two similar, but different cases. (One reports on declarations, the other on invocations.)
=== on 1 Dec 2015, 14:59:49 Ann Campbell wrote:
I've updated the end of the description with a "this rule raises an issue" sentence. Please check my accuracy.
=== on 30 May 2023, 17:10:00 Cristian Ambrosini wrote:
During a LaYC sprint, I removed cfamily dummy implementation, since it's not implemented in the corresponding analyzer and there are no tickets open in order to do so.