rspec/rules/S2224/comments-and-links.adoc
2021-06-08 14:23:48 +02:00

14 lines
637 B
Plaintext

=== duplicates: S1121
=== on 26 May 2015, 18:11:40 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] RSPEC-1121 mentions "MISRA C:2012, 13.4 The result of an assignment operator should not be used", which supposed to cover this case. And C-Family implementation of RSPEC-1121 covers it. Hence question - this separate RSPEC redundant or not?
=== on 27 May 2015, 14:17:56 Ann Campbell wrote:
I wish I could remember why I wrote this rule [~evgeny.mandrikov].
Closed as a duplicate.
=== on 27 May 2015, 14:35:23 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] we can introduce notes for RSPECs, which could help to preserve original intention ;)