rspec/rules/S1066/scala/rule.adoc
2023-10-16 15:51:00 +02:00

70 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
include::../description.adoc[]
[source,scala]
----
if (condition1) {
if (condition2) { // Noncompliant
/* ... */
}
}
----
Will be more readable as
[source,scala]
----
if (condition1 && condition2) { // Compliant
/* ... */
}
----
== How to fix it
If merging the conditions seems to result in a more complex code, extracting the condition or part of it in a named function or variable is a better approach to fix readability.
=== Code examples
==== Noncompliant code example
[source,scala]
----
if (file != null) {
if (file.isFile || file.isDirectory) { // Noncompliant
/* ... */
}
}
----
==== Compliant solution
[source,scala]
----
if (file != null && isFileOrDirectory(file)) { // Compliant
/* ... */
}
def isFileOrDirectory(file: File): Boolean = file.isFile || file.isDirectory
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
include::../highlighting.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]