
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in.
60 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
60 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
For optimal code readability, annotation arguments should be specified in the same order that they were declared in the annotation definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
@interface Pet {
|
|
String name();
|
|
String surname();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Pet(surname ="", name="") // Noncompliant
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
@interface Pet {
|
|
String name();
|
|
String surname();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Pet(name ="", surname="") // Compliant
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== Message
|
|
|
|
Reorder these annotation arguments to match their order of declaration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== on 1 Sep 2015, 12:30:47 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
In my editing, [~nicolas.peru], I haven't filled in a message. It's unclear to me whether you want to raise an issue per argument or an issue per annotation. So I've left that to you to fill in. :-)
|
|
|
|
=== on 23 Sep 2015, 13:34:36 Nicolas Peru wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] can you review message and mark as complete if it is ok for you ?
|
|
|
|
=== on 28 Sep 2015, 18:07:53 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
done [~nicolas.peru]
|
|
|
|
=== on 1 Oct 2019, 11:32:16 Michael Gumowski wrote:
|
|
This rule is deprecated, without alternative. Nothing in JVMLS, or JLS, guarantees that order of annotation members will be preserved once compiled. See SONARJAVA-3194 for more details.
|
|
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|