rspec/rules/S4274/java/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

48 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
An ``++assert++`` is inappropriate for parameter validation because assertions can be disabled at runtime in the JVM, meaning that a bad operational setting would completely eliminate the intended checks. Further, ``++assert++``s that fail throw ``++AssertionError++``s, rather than throwing some type of ``++Exception++``. Throwing ``++Error++``s is completely outside of the normal realm of expected ``++catch++``/``++throw++`` behavior in normal programs.
This rule raises an issue when a ``++public++`` method uses one or more of its parameters with ``++assert++``s.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
public void setPrice(int price) {
assert price >= 0 && price <= MAX_PRICE;
// Set the price
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
public void setPrice(int price) {
if (price < 0 || price > MAX_PRICE) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid price: " + price);
}
// Set the price
}
----
== Resources
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/language/assert.html[Programming With Assertions]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
include::../highlighting.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]