89 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
89 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== Message
|
|
|
|
Rename parameter "xxx" to "yyy".
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== is duplicated by: S821
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S5319
|
|
|
|
=== relates to: S822
|
|
|
|
=== relates to: S1017
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S829
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S833
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S926
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S1047
|
|
|
|
=== on 19 Sep 2014, 16:04:44 Freddy Mallet wrote:
|
|
@Ann:
|
|
|
|
* The reference to the relating MISRAC-{cpp} rule 8-4-2 and not 8-4-1 if my understanding is correct.
|
|
* In the "Compliant Solution", "//noncompliant..." comments should be removed
|
|
* I would not mention API08-C, as this rule refer to something almost at the opposite -> parameters should not be named
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== on 19 Sep 2014, 16:06:01 Freddy Mallet wrote:
|
|
This rule can almost be associated to the SQALE "Logic Related Reliability" sub-caracteristic
|
|
|
|
=== on 24 Sep 2014, 14:48:00 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
\[~freddy.mallet] See what you think about "Conflicting" instead of "See also" in the references section.
|
|
|
|
=== on 31 Oct 2014, 09:26:25 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
|
|
Description should be updated to fully cover RSPEC-821, which is about MISRA C:2012, 8.3 and now marked as duplicate of this one.
|
|
|
|
=== on 13 May 2015, 19:41:54 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
\[~tamas.vajk], please provide R# id if one exists
|
|
|
|
=== on 13 May 2015, 19:42:01 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
consulted \https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/6b0scde8%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
|
|
|
|
=== on 13 May 2015, 19:42:23 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
\[~evgeny.mandrikov] note that this seemed familiar to me, but I couldn't find a relevant C-Family rule.
|
|
|
|
=== on 13 May 2015, 21:03:05 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] I suppose that you have in mind RSPEC-927
|
|
|
|
=== on 14 May 2015, 11:12:14 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
Thanks [~evgeny.mandrikov]
|
|
|
|
=== on 22 May 2015, 09:44:25 Tamas Vajk wrote:
|
|
Could you run through it one more time? There were minor modifications in the sample code.
|
|
|
|
=== on 22 May 2015, 12:14:06 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
\[~tamas.vajk] I'm not sure why you swapped the parameter order. I feel like reversing the names is a better illustration of the confusion that could result in param names that don't match...?
|
|
|
|
=== on 22 May 2015, 12:48:42 Tamas Vajk wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] I changed it because `yk` was not used in the method body, so it already just looked like a typo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've changed the sample code.
|
|
|
|
=== on 22 May 2015, 14:35:14 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
Thanks [~tamas.vajk]. Looks good
|
|
|
|
=== on 08 June 2023, 17:00:00 Sebastien Marichal wrote:
|
|
|
|
During a LaYC sprint, I removed dummy implementations for the following language:
|
|
|
|
* cfamily
|
|
* java
|
|
* javascript
|
|
|
|
It is not implemented in the corresponding analyzer and there currently are no tickets open in order to do so.
|
|
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[] |