rspec/rules/S3553/java/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

72 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
The Java language authors have been quite frank that ``++Optional++`` was intended for use only as a return type, as a way to convey that a method may or may not return a value.
And for that, it's valuable but using ``++Optional++`` on the input side increases the work you have to do in the method without really increasing the value. With an ``++Optional++`` parameter, you go from having 2 possible inputs: null and not-null, to three: null, non-null-without-value, and non-null-with-value. Add to that the fact that overloading has long been available to convey that some parameters are optional, and there's really no reason to have ``++Optional++`` parameters.
The rule also checks for Guava's ``++Optional++``, as it was the inspiration for the JDK ``++Optional++``. Although it is different in some aspects (serialization, being recommended for use as collection elements), using it as a parameter type causes exactly the same problems as for JDK ``++Optional++``.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
public String sayHello(Optional<String> name) { // Noncompliant
if (name == null || !name.isPresent()) {
return "Hello World";
} else {
return "Hello " + name;
}
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
public String sayHello(String name) {
if (name == null) {
return "Hello World";
} else {
return "Hello " + name;
}
}
----
=== Exceptions
No issues will be raised if a method is overriding, as the developer has no control over the signature at this point.
[source,java]
----
@Override
public String sayHello(Optional<String> name) {
if (name == null || !name.isPresent()) {
return "Hello World";
} else {
return "Hello " + name;
}
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Specify a "xxx" parameter instead.
=== Highlighting
``++Optional<T>++``
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]