39 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
39 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
=== deprecates: S1875
|
|
|
|
=== deprecates: S2848
|
|
|
|
=== deprecates: S2998
|
|
|
|
=== relates to: S1848
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S1763
|
|
|
|
=== relates to: S901
|
|
|
|
=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:06:34 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
Uhm... I think this rule simply mandates that S/RSPEC-901 be included in any SonarQube analysis.
|
|
|
|
=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:07:13 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
\[~samuel.mercier] this probably deserves an "unused" tag
|
|
|
|
=== on 15 Jul 2016, 14:19:35 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
https://github.com/google/error-prone/blob/master/docs/bugpattern/UnusedAnonymousClass.md
|
|
|
|
=== on 10 Mar 2017, 09:09:33 Elena Vilchik wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] Can we update the message to explain why statement is wrong? E.g. ``++Remove or refactor this statement. It has no side-effect.++``
|
|
|
|
=== on 10 Mar 2017, 14:01:48 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
Absolutely [~elena.vilchik]! Done.
|
|
|
|
=== on 16 Oct 2018, 11:01:51 Alexandre Gigleux wrote:
|
|
Irrelevant for Java. Better covered by RSPEC-2246
|
|
|
|
=== on 24 Sep 2019, 16:34:02 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
|
|
Irrelevant for C#.
|
|
|
|
Example: When adding ``++1 == 1++`` in a method, the compilation fails with the following error message: "Only assignment, call, increment, decrement, await, and new object expressions can be used as a statement"
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is also better covered by RSPEC-3448
|
|
|