rspec/rules/S126/scala/rule.adoc
Arseniy Zaostrovnykh 11c08de44a
Revert "RULEAPI-665: Remove security standards from the irrelevant language-specific rules" (#361)
This reverts commit 892bccde8ffcdf2a6d662d97ec469cd63de87878.
2021-09-17 13:50:03 +02:00

43 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext

This rule applies whenever an ``++if++`` statement is followed by one or more ``++else if++`` statements; the final ``++else if++`` should be followed by an ``++else++`` statement.
The requirement for a final ``++else++`` statement is defensive programming.
The ``++else++`` statement should either take appropriate action or contain a suitable comment as to why no action is taken. This is consistent with the requirement to have a final ``++case _++`` clause in a ``++match++``.
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
if (x == 0) {
doSomething
} else if (x == 1) {
doSomethingElse
}
----
== Compliant Solution
----
if (x == 0) {
doSomething
} else if (x == 1) {
doSomethingElse
} else {
throw new IllegalStateException
}
----
== Exceptions
When all branches of an ``++if++``-``++else if++`` end with ``++return++``, ``++break++`` or ``++throw++``, the code that comes after the ``++if++`` implicitly behaves as if it was in an ``++else++`` clause. This rule will therefore ignore that case.
include::../see.adoc[]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]