rspec/rules/S3237/csharp/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

80 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
In property and indexer ``++set++`` methods, and in event ``++add++`` and ``++remove++`` methods, the implicit ``++value++`` parameter holds the value the accessor was called with. Not using the ``++value++`` means that the accessor ignores the caller's intent which could cause unexpected results at runtime.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,csharp]
----
private int count;
public int Count
{
get { return count; }
set { count = 42; } // Noncompliant
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,csharp]
----
private int count;
public int Count
{
get { return count; }
set { count = value; }
}
----
or
[source,csharp]
----
public int Count
{
get { return count; }
set { throw new InvalidOperationException(); }
}
----
=== Exceptions
This rule doesn't raise an issue when the setter is empty and part of the implementation of an ``++interface++`` . The assumption is that this part of the interface is not meaningful to that particular implementation. A good example of that would be a "sink" logger that discards any logs.
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Use the "value" parameter in this [property set|indexer set|event] accessor.
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 8 Jul 2015, 13:51:34 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] 10min seems like a high remediation cost. Does that mean that the Compliant Solution I added is off-base?
=== on 20 Jul 2015, 11:59:05 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] We can reduce the required time.
=== on 20 Jul 2015, 13:53:16 Ann Campbell wrote:
I halved it to 5min, [~tamas.vajk]
=== on 27 Jul 2015, 15:39:03 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~dinesh.bolkensteyn] note that I've edited the first line. Your version, "a property and indexer ``++set++`` method" speaks of one, collective method for both a property and an indexer at one time.
=== on 27 Jul 2015, 15:44:58 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
thanks [~ann.campbell.2]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]