rspec/rules/S131/java/rule.adoc
2021-10-28 10:07:16 +02:00

85 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

include::../description.adoc[]
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
switch (param) { //missing default clause
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
case 1:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
switch (param) {
default: // default clause should be the last one
error();
break;
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
case 1:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
----
== Compliant Solution
----
switch (param) {
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
case 1:
doSomethingElse();
break;
default:
error();
break;
}
----
== Exceptions
If the ``++switch++`` parameter is an ``++Enum++`` and if all the constants of this enum are used in the ``++case++`` statements, then no ``++default++`` clause is expected.
Example:
----
public enum Day {
SUNDAY, MONDAY
}
...
switch(day) {
case SUNDAY:
doSomething();
break;
case MONDAY:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
----
== See
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/478.html[MITRE, CWE-478] - Missing Default Case in Switch Statement
* https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/x/RtYxBQ[CERT, MSC01-C.] - Strive for logical completeness
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]