rspec/rules/S2322/xml/comments-and-links.adoc

37 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

=== on 17 Jun 2015, 14:44:26 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] assigned to you for review.
=== on 18 Jun 2015, 09:12:46 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] BTW regarding the message, the rule create an issue on the first invalid element found in the file, with the message from the validator engine.
For example, for a Maven Project Model:
----
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>helloWorld</groupId>
<artifactId>helloWorld</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<hello> </hello> // <-- "Invalid content was found starting with element 'hello'."
</project>
----
So I am not sure on how it should be formulated.
=== on 18 Jun 2015, 12:16:38 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~linda.martin] I've simplified the description of the filePattern parameter, but otherwise this looks fine to me.
=== on 18 Jun 2015, 12:24:38 Ann Campbell wrote:
In fact [~linda.martin], I've realized that the description of the filePattern parameter should probably specify which wildcards (if any) may be used.
=== on 12 Nov 2015, 18:23:20 Linda Martin wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] OK LGTM that way!