rspec/rules/S2712/python/comments-and-links.adoc

34 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext

=== on 17 Mar 2015, 08:41:25 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2]
1. We should focus in rule description that "return" contains argument. "return" without argument can be used in generator.
2. About labels: may be we should create tag for syntax error, and to use it in all such python rules. For example "syntax". What do you think?
=== on 17 Mar 2015, 17:48:41 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~elena.vilchik] I've updated the description. See if it's enough.
I'm not wild about the proposed tag.
=== on 27 Nov 2019, 14:52:09 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
Deprecating this rule because it is possible to use ``++return++`` in a generator since Python 3.3, which was released on September 29, 2012.
The following code:
----
return 42
----
is equivalent to
----
raise StopIteration(42)
----
See https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0380/#formal-semantics[PEP 380] for more information.
Note also that https://www.python.org/doc/sunset-python-2/[official python 2 support will be stopped on January 1, 2020], thus there is no point in having this rule enabled by default.