rspec/rules/S1317/java/rule.adoc
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00

16 lines
562 B
Plaintext

Instantiating a ``++StringBuilder++`` or a ``++StringBuffer++`` with a character is misleading because most Java developers would expect the character to be the initial value of the ``++StringBuffer++``.
What actually happens is that the int representation of the character is used to determine the initial size of the ``++StringBuffer++``.
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
StringBuffer foo = new StringBuffer('x'); //equivalent to StringBuffer foo = new StringBuffer(120);
----
== Compliant Solution
----
StringBuffer foo = new StringBuffer("x");
----