rspec/rules/S4015/csharp/rule.adoc
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00

41 lines
734 B
Plaintext

Changing an inherited member to ``++private++`` will not prevent access to the base class implementation.
This rule raises an issue when a ``++private++`` method in an unsealed type has a signature that is identical to a ``++public++`` method declared in a base type.
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
using System;
namespace MyLibrary
{
public class Foo
{
public void SomeMethod(int count) { }
}
public class Bar:Foo
{
private void SomeMethod(int count) { } // Noncompliant
}
}
----
== Compliant Solution
----
using System;
namespace MyLibrary
{
public class Foo
{
public void SomeMethod(int count) { }
}
public sealed class Bar : Foo
{
private void SomeMethod(int count) { }
}
}
----