23 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
23 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
=== replaces: S3255
|
|
|
|
=== on 8 Jul 2015, 18:14:20 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
\[~elena.vilchik] note that I've converted this to a subtask of a rule with a more widely-applicable name. Since it's not implemented yet in Swift, I don't anticipate problems with that, but let me know if there are.
|
|
|
|
=== on 27 Jul 2015, 06:57:13 Elena Vilchik wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] Unfortunately, it was already implemented. So it's wrong rule key in release (S2963 instead of S3255). WDYT should be done to fix this inconsistency?
|
|
|
|
=== on 27 Jul 2015, 13:51:01 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
After discussion with [~elena.vilchik]:
|
|
|
|
Because Swift version had already been coded and released, this task became the parent, to preserve the rule key, and its contents swapped to the more generic ``++this++``. A new Swift subtask was created, preserving the original contents of this RSpec.
|
|
|
|
=== on 27 Jul 2015, 13:51:59 Ann Campbell wrote:
|
|
Do you want to look this over [~elena.vilchik] & make sure I didn't miss anything?
|
|
|
|
=== on 27 Jul 2015, 13:56:44 Elena Vilchik wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] i removed swift-specific message from parent. Otherwise looks good!
|
|
|
|
=== on 16 Nov 2015, 15:41:37 Tamas Vajk wrote:
|
|
This rule was untargeted for C#, because Visual Studio 2015 reports this to the user in the IDE by default. (The rule ID is IDE0003)
|
|
|