ab6d0f08b7
## Review A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for: - [ ] logical errors and incorrect information - [ ] information gaps and missing content - [ ] text style and tone - [ ] PR summary and labels follow [the guidelines](https://github.com/SonarSource/rspec/#to-modify-an-existing-rule)
12 lines
780 B
Plaintext
12 lines
780 B
Plaintext
=== deprecates: S1850
|
|
|
|
=== is related to: S3650
|
|
|
|
=== relates to: S1764
|
|
|
|
=== on 1 Feb 2016, 10:21:45 Freddy Mallet wrote:
|
|
Question : should we consider this RSPEC as being fully a subset of RSPEC-2583 ? I think the only motivation behind this split was to use a different severity and this remains a relevant point.
|
|
|
|
=== on 29 Feb 2016, 08:37:04 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:
|
|
\[~freddy.mallet] I don't really see why this RSPEC is "fully a subset of RSPEC-2583". Maybe that makes sense if it is implemented through symbolic execution with short-circuit logical operators, but then it all depends on the order of sub-conditions. Please consider ``++IF X > 1 AND X = 5++``: I think that this code would raise an issue for the current description of this RSPEC, but not for RSPEC-2583.
|