rspec/rules/S3626/python/rule.adoc
2022-02-04 16:28:24 +00:00

54 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext

Jump statements, such as ``++return++``, ``++break++`` and ``++continue++`` let you change the default flow of program execution, but jump statements that direct the control flow to the original direction are just a waste of keystrokes.
== Noncompliant Code Example
[source,python]
----
def redundant_jump(x):
if x == 1:
print(True)
return # NonCompliant
----
== Compliant Solution
[source,python]
----
def redundant_jump(x):
if x == 1:
print(True)
----
== Exceptions
* No issue is raised if the jump statement is the only statement of a statement suite:
----
def my_function(x):
if x > 5:
do_something()
elif x == 0:
return # ok even it could be changed to "pass"
else:
do_something_else()
----
* No issue is raised for ``++return None++`` because this was certainly done on purpose to be explicit that a function is really returning ``++None++``.
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
include::../highlighting.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]