rspec/rules/S3923/python/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 1d958ef229
Modify rule S3923: LaYC identical branches
Co-authored-by: Amélie Renard <44666826+amelie-renard-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-06-08 17:06:21 +02:00

55 lines
1023 B
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
Having all branches of an `if` chain with the same implementation indicates a problem.
In the following code:
[source,python]
----
if b == 0: # Noncompliant
doOneMoreThing()
elif b == 1:
doOneMoreThing()
else:
doOneMoreThing()
b = 4 if a > 12 else 4 # Noncompliant
----
Either there is a copy-paste error that needs fixing or the unnecessary `if` chain needs removing.
=== Exceptions
This rule does not apply to `if` chains without `else`.
[source,python]
----
if b == 0: # no issue, this could have been done on purpose to make the code more readable
doOneMoreThing()
elif b == 1:
doOneMoreThing()
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
=== Highlighting
primary: the top "if" keyword
secondary: each identical body of the "if-elif-else"
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]