45 lines
897 B
Plaintext
45 lines
897 B
Plaintext
The use of ``++short++``s saves a little bit of memory, but actually increases processor use because the JVM has no real capability for handling ``++short++``s. Instead, it must convert each ``++short++`` to an ``++int++`` before performing any operations on it, then convert it back to a ``++short++`` for storage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Noncompliant Code Example
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
public class MyClass {
|
|
short s = 0; // Noncompliant
|
|
|
|
public short doubleSmallNumber(short num) { // Noncompliant
|
|
return num+num;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Compliant Solution
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
public class MyClass {
|
|
int s = 0;
|
|
|
|
public int doubleSmallNumber(int num) {
|
|
return num+num;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Implementation Specification
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::message.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|