rspec/rules/S3621/cobol/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

70 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
When a ``++SELECT++`` returns ``++null++`` from a nullable column, the relevant host variable isn't updated; it simply retains its previous value. The only way you'll ever know the column value was ``++null++`` is to check the relevant null indicator included in the ``++SELECT++`` for a negative (``++null++``) value.
This rule raises an issue when a ``++SELECT++`` omits a ``++null++`` indicator for a nullable column.
*Note* that this rule raises issues only when a database catalog is provided during the SonarQube analysis.
=== Noncompliant code example
With the table ``++PRODUCT++`` having a nullable column ``++NAME++``:
[source,cobol]
----
EXEC SQL
SELECT
PROD_ID,
NAME
INTO
:P-ID,
:P-NAME -- Noncompliant; No null indicator
FROM PRODUCT
END-EXEC
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,cobol]
----
EXEC SQL
SELECT
PROD_ID,
NAME
INTO
:P-ID,
:P-NAME :P-NAME-NULL -- Compliant
FROM PRODUCT
END-EXEC
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Add a null indicator for "xxx"; it is nullable.
=== Highlighting
Host variable
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 17 May 2016, 20:59:42 Ann Campbell wrote:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPGG_9.5.0/com.ibm.db2.luw.apdv.embed.doc/doc/t0005636.html
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]