rspec/rules/S3051/java/rule.adoc
2022-02-04 16:28:24 +00:00

39 lines
812 B
Plaintext

"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet," but ``++main++`` by any other name would not. Just because a method has the name "main", that doesn't make it the entry point to an application. It must also have the correct signature. Specifically, it must be ``++public static void++`` and accept a single ``++String []++`` as an argument.
== Noncompliant Code Example
[source,java]
----
public void main(String arg) { // Noncompliant
// ...
}
----
== Compliant Solution
[source,java]
----
public static void main(String [] args) {
// ...
}
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]