16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in.
52 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
52 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
Using ``++int++`` is implementation-defined because bit-fields of type ``++int++`` can be either ``++signed++`` or ``++unsigned++``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of ``++wchar_t++`` as a bit-field type is prohibited as ISO/IEC 14882:2003 does not explicitly define the underlying representation as ``++signed++`` or ``++unsigned++``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,cpp]
|
|
----
|
|
struct S
|
|
{
|
|
char c : 2; // Noncompliant
|
|
int i : 2; // Noncompliant
|
|
short f : 2; // Noncompliant
|
|
wchar_t k : 2; // Noncompliant
|
|
signed int a : 2; // Compliant
|
|
unsigned int b : 2; // Compliant
|
|
signed char d : 2; // Compliant
|
|
unsigned char e : 2; // Compliant
|
|
signed short g : 2; // Compliant
|
|
unsigned short h : 2; // Compliant
|
|
bool j : 2; // Compliant
|
|
uint32_t l : 2; // Compliant
|
|
int8_t m : 2; // Compliant
|
|
};
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Resources
|
|
|
|
* MISRA {cpp}:2008, 9-6-2
|
|
* ISO/IEC 14882:2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== duplicates: S814
|
|
|
|
=== on 9 Dec 2014, 21:11:36 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] I'd like to close this as duplicate of RSPEC-814, however they are significantly different in definition of SQALE model (characteristic and cost). So could you please advise which of those two SQALE models should be used?
|
|
|
|
=== on 9 Dec 2014, 21:12:36 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
|
|
Also they are different in default severity and activation.
|
|
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|