69 lines
929 B
Plaintext
69 lines
929 B
Plaintext
The ``++default++`` clause should take appropriate action. Having an empty ``++default++`` is a waste of keystrokes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Noncompliant Code Example
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
enum Fruit
|
|
{
|
|
Apple,
|
|
Orange,
|
|
Banana
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void PrintName(Fruit fruit)
|
|
{
|
|
switch(fruit)
|
|
{
|
|
case Fruit.Apple:
|
|
Console.WriteLine("apple");
|
|
break;
|
|
default: //Noncompliant
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Compliant Solution
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
enum Fruit
|
|
{
|
|
Apple,
|
|
Orange,
|
|
Banana
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void PrintName(Fruit fruit)
|
|
{
|
|
switch(fruit)
|
|
{
|
|
case Fruit.Apple:
|
|
Console.WriteLine("apple");
|
|
break;
|
|
default:
|
|
throw new NotSupportedException();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
void PrintName(Fruit fruit)
|
|
{
|
|
switch(fruit)
|
|
{
|
|
case Fruit.Apple:
|
|
Console.WriteLine("apple");
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Exceptions
|
|
|
|
``++default++`` clauses containing only a comment are ignored with the assumption that they are empty on purpose and the comment documents why.
|
|
|