rspec/rules/S4425/java/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

56 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
Using ``++Integer.toHexString++`` is a common mistake when converting sequences of bytes into hexadecimal string representations. The problem is that the method trims leading zeroes, which can lead to wrong conversions. For instance a two bytes value of ``++0x4508++`` would be converted into ``++45++`` and ``++8++`` which once concatenated would give ``++0x458++``.
This is particularly damaging when converting hash-codes and could lead to a security vulnerability.
This rule raises an issue when ``++Integer.toHexString++`` is used in any kind of string concatenations.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,java]
----
MessageDigest md = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-256");
byte[] bytes = md.digest(password.getBytes("UTF-8"));
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (byte b : bytes) {
sb.append(Integer.toHexString( b & 0xFF )); // Noncompliant
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,java]
----
MessageDigest md = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-256");
byte[] bytes = md.digest(password.getBytes("UTF-8"));
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (byte b : bytes) {
sb.append(String.format("%02X", b));
}
----
== Resources
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/704[MITRE, CWE-704] - Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast
* Derived from FindSecBugs rule https://find-sec-bugs.github.io/bugs.htm#BAD_HEXA_CONVERSION[BAD_HEXA_CONVERSION]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Use String.format( "%02X", ...) instead
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]