rspec/rules/S1845/python/rule.adoc
2022-02-04 16:28:24 +00:00

40 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

Looking at the set of methods and fields in a ``++class++`` and finding two that differ only by capitalization is confusing to users of the class.
This situation may simply indicate poor naming. Method names should be action-oriented, and thus contain a verb, which is unlikely in the case where both a method and a field have the same name (with or without capitalization differences). However, renaming a public method could be disruptive to callers. Therefore renaming the member is the recommended action.
== Noncompliant Code Example
[source,python]
----
class SomeClass:
lookUp = false
def lookup(): # Non-compliant; method name differs from field name only by capitalization
pass
----
== Compliant Solution
[source,python]
----
class SomeClass:
lookUp = false
def getLookUp():
pass
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]