rspec/rules/S3281/xml/rule.adoc
Fred Tingaud 16f6c0aecf
Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940)
Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once.

Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information
on what language the code is written in.
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00

80 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
Default interceptors, such as application security interceptors, must be listed in the ``++ejb-jar.xml++`` file, or they will not be treated as default.
This rule applies to projects that contain JEE Beans (any one of ``++javax.ejb.Singleton++``, ``++MessageDriven++``, ``++Stateless++`` or ``++Stateful++``).
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,xml]
----
// file: ejb-interceptors.xml
<assembly-descriptor>
<interceptor-binding> <!-- should be declared in ejb-jar.xml -->
<ejb-name>*</ejb-name>
<interceptor-class>com.myco.ImportantInterceptor</interceptor-class> <!-- Noncompliant; will NOT be treated as default -->
</interceptor-binding>
</assembly-descriptor>
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,xml]
----
// file: ejb-jar.xml
<assembly-descriptor>
<interceptor-binding>
<ejb-name>*</ejb-name>
<interceptor-class>com.myco.ImportantInterceptor</interceptor-class>
</interceptor-binding>
</assembly-descriptor>
----
== Resources
* https://owasp.org/Top10/A05_2021-Security_Misconfiguration/[OWASP Top 10 2021 Category A5] - Security Misconfiguration
* https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A6_2017-Security_Misconfiguration[OWASP Top 10 2017 Category A6] - Security Misconfiguration
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Move this default interceptor to "ejb-jar.xml"
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 23 Jul 2015, 13:02:01 Ann Campbell wrote:
Rule origin: \https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sonarqube/cYQdBhf00eo
Project is EJB if it contains JEE Beans (any one of javax.ejb.Singleton, MessageDriven, Stateless or Stateful) (@Local/@Remote interfaces are not mandatory)
=== on 30 Jul 2015, 13:04:52 Nicolas Peru wrote:
Your comment should probably be part of the rule description. Otherwise looks good.
=== on 30 Jul 2015, 14:01:39 Ann Campbell wrote:
done [~nicolas.peru]
=== on 19 Mar 2018, 09:54:11 Sébastien GIORIA - AppSecFR wrote:
Could be tagged OWASP A6:2017
=== on 20 Mar 2018, 07:24:20 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Done [~SPoint], thanks !
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]