23 lines
727 B
Plaintext
23 lines
727 B
Plaintext
There's no point in having a JUnit ``++TestCase++`` without any test methods. Similarly, you shouldn't have a file in the tests directory named ``++*Test++``, ``++*Tests++``, or ``++*TestCase++``, but no tests in the file. Doing either of these things may lead someone to think that uncovered classes have been tested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This rule raises an issue when files in the test directory are named ``++*Test++``, ``++*Tests++``, or ``++*TestCase++`` or implement ``++TestCase++`` but don't contain any tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supported frameworks:
|
|
|
|
* JUnit3
|
|
* JUnit4
|
|
* JUnit5
|
|
* TestNG
|
|
* Zohhak
|
|
* ArchUnit
|
|
* Pact
|
|
|
|
ifdef::rspecator-view[]
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
|
endif::rspecator-view[]
|