rspec/rules/S3058/java/comments-and-links.adoc
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00

12 lines
622 B
Plaintext

=== On 2015-06-12T15:34:57Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
CodePro: Overriding a Non-abstract Method with an Abstract Method
=== On 2015-06-12T15:50:29Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] I'm wondering if I should have rolled this into RSPEC-2177, altho I'm a bit reluctant to roll something that deserves a "dope-slap" tag (this one) into something that's mainly an "oops".
WDYT?
=== On 2015-06-15T20:21:21Z Nicolas Peru Wrote:
This one looks good and intent is fairly different: RSPEC-2177 detects abused overloading whereas this one clearly indicates a bad design. As you point it out, severity is definitely not the same.