rspec/rules/S3532/csharp/comments-and-links.adoc
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00

8 lines
302 B
Plaintext

=== Related: RSPEC-108
=== Related: RSPEC-131
=== On 2016-02-05T16:42:33Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
Normally RSPEC-131 would be expected to cover this case, but in C# that rule is thought to make too much noise, while at the same time, there is still a desire to flag and eliminate empty ``++default++``s