46 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
46 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
== Why is this an issue?
|
|
|
|
``++PreparedStatement++``s and ``++CallableStatement++``s (for stored procedures) are safer and more efficient than ``++Statement++``s and should always be preferred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This rule raises an issue each time a ``++Statement++`` is declared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Noncompliant code example
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
Statement stmt = null; // Noncompliant
|
|
// ...
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Compliant solution
|
|
|
|
[source,java]
|
|
----
|
|
PreparedStatement stmt = null;
|
|
// ...
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Resources
|
|
|
|
* OWASP - https://owasp.org/Top10/A05_2021-Security_Misconfiguration/[Top 10 2021 Category A5 - Security Misconfiguration]
|
|
* CWE - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20[CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation]
|
|
* CWE - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89[CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command]
|
|
* OWASP - https://owasp.org/www-pdf-archive/OWASP_Top_10_-_2013.pdf[Top 10 2013 Category A1 - Injection]
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|
|
'''
|
|
== Comments And Links
|
|
(visible only on this page)
|
|
|
|
=== duplicates: S2077
|
|
|
|
=== on 1 Dec 2015, 11:14:50 Michael Gumowski wrote:
|
|
LGTM!
|
|
|
|
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
|