rspec/rules/S131/scala/rule.adoc

42 lines
813 B
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
The requirement for a final ``++case _++`` clause is defensive programming. The clause should either take appropriate action, or contain a suitable comment as to why no action is taken.
=== Noncompliant code example
[source,scala]
----
param match {
case 1 => doSomething
case 2 => doSomethingElse
}
----
=== Compliant solution
[source,scala]
----
param match {
case 1 => doSomething
case 2 => doSomethingElse
case _ => throw new IllegalArgumentException(s"Unexpected param: $param")
}
----
include::../see.adoc[]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]