Fred Tingaud d3cfe19d7e
Fix broken or dangerous backquotes
Co-authored-by: Marco Borgeaud <89914223+marco-antognini-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-30 10:33:56 +01:00

53 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

== Why is this an issue?
A ``++switch++`` statement is a control flow statement that allows you to execute different blocks of code based on the value of an expression. It provides a more concise way to handle multiple conditions compared to using multiple ``++if-else++`` statements.
If you only have a single condition to check, using an ``++if++`` statement is simpler and more concise. ``++switch++`` statements are designed for handling multiple cases, so using them for a single condition can be overkill and less readable.
This rule raises an issue when a ``++switch++`` statement has only one ``++case++`` clause and possibly a ``++default++`` one.
[source,javascript,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
----
switch (condition) { // Noncompliant: The switch has only one case and a default
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
default:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
----
Use a ``++switch++`` statement when you have multiple cases to handle and an ``++if++`` statement when you have only one condition to check.
[source,javascript,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
----
if (condition === 0) {
doSomething();
} else {
doSomethingElse();
}
----
== Resources
=== Documentation
* MDN web docs - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/switch[``++switch++``]
* MDN web docs - link:++https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/if...else++[``++if...else++``]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]